← Search

Paula Lawson

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
323 matches · 203W–120L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Paula Lawson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history323 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Ladies of Leisure · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marnie Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Kristen Jacobs / Heather Rice
2026-09-08 · Ladies of Leisure · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Adamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-17 · WTF 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Mertz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Ralph Rico championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-12 · WTF 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Hallingstad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ralph Rico mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ralph Rico mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Emery Baker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-2
W
2026-06-10 · Net Results · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emery Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-03 · Net Results · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emery Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · Net Results · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emery Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
67.7%
65W–31L · 57.7% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.4% of games
7.5mixed
57.6%
19W–14L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
59.2%
29W–20L · 53.8% of games
8.5mixed
92%
23W–2L · 66.9% of games
9.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
107 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
96 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King