← Search

Maryann Moorhead

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 150W–108L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maryann Moorhead to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history258 matches
L
2026-09-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Measham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Measham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-02 · Pour Decisions · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · Pour Decisions · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-25 · Honey Badgers · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bob Lopez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · Pour Decisions · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Perlaky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Pour Decisions · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · Pour Decisions · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · Pour Decisions · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Measham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-03 · Pour Decisions · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Perlaky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Valerie Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Valerie Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
61%
50W–32L · 54.5% of games
4.5
70%
7W–3L · 49.5% of games
8.0
64.4%
38W–21L · 53.8% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.4% of games
8.0mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 50.7% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
12W–24L · 43.9% of games
9.0mixed
75.9%
22W–7L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
82 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert