← Search

Stacia Albiston

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 59W–33L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Stacia Albiston to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Tiffany Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · Slice Girls 18+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · Honey Deuce 18's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Honey Deuce 18's · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-06-15 · Slice Girls 18+ · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Honey Deuce 18's · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Slice Girls 18+ · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Honey Deuce 18's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-02 · Honey Deuce 18's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · Slice Girls 18+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
9W–0L · 74.2% of games
3.5
81.2%
26W–6L · 60.8% of games
4.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 54.1% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#1 Singles
24%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#2 Singles
20%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer