← Search

Zel Mertz

Caldwell, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
528 matches · 337W–191L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Zel Mertz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history528 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Ladies of Leisure · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Gastanaga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · WTF 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karl Baughman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · WTF 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karl Baughman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · WTF 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ross Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · WTF 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremy Canning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Ira Fagin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with James Mertz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Ira Fagin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Ira Fagin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with James Mertz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · WTF 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ross Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Martin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
72.2%
83W–32L · 58.6% of games
4.0
33.8%
23W–45L · 43.1% of games
7.0
80%
24W–6L · 61.8% of games
8.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.8% of games
6.5mixed
51.9%
14W–13L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
75.7%
53W–17L · 59% of games
7.5mixed
65.3%
32W–17L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
78%
39W–11L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
231 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
173 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
124 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova