← Search

Nathan Richardson

Pocatello, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
269 matches · 131W–138L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nathan Richardson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history269 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Quincy Sutton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Allishia Sanford championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Quincy Sutton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Ashley Snyder championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · Brake · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · Brake · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-05 · BROWNIES BUNCH · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-04 · Shawn Oram · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cody Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · Shawn Oram · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · Brake · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · Brake · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Brake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-27 · BROWNIES BUNCH · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cory Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 44.3% of games
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 57.2% of games
3.5
50%
28W–28L · 50% of games
4.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 42.6% of games
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 69.6% of games
6.0mixed
55.9%
19W–15L · 51.9% of games
6.5mixed
50%
9W–9L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
54.1%
20W–17L · 49.9% of games
7.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.9% of games
8.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
63 matches
#1 Singles
12%
32 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King