← Search

Zac Gershberg

Pocatello, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
236 matches · 159W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Zac Gershberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history236 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Melissa Brake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Melissa Brake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Debbie Akers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · Pocatello · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · Pocatello · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Pocatello · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · Pocatello · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Melissa Brake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · The Chancla · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cory Spicer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · The Chancla · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 56.8% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
55.3%
26W–21L · 52.9% of games
4.0
80%
24W–6L · 63.6% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 57.5% of games
6.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
25W–15L · 54.2% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
18W–3L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
68 matches
#1 Singles
23%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
36 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal