← Search

Melissa Brake

Pocatello, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
496 matches · 317W–179L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Melissa Brake to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history496 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Zac Gershberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Zac Gershberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Mikel Harmon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Osborn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · Ace Holes · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Holly Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · Ace Holes · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emilee Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · Ace Holes · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · Ace Holes · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Millican
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joni Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · Harmon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikel Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-19 · Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikel Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Ace Holes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Millican
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
58.8%
30W–21L · 54.4% of games
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 67.8% of games
3.0
70%
14W–6L · 57.5% of games
3.5
72.5%
50W–19L · 62.6% of games
4.0
44.7%
17W–21L · 47.2% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 42.4% of games
5.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 54.7% of games
6.5mixed
89.5%
17W–2L · 62.4% of games
7.0mixed
71.7%
43W–17L · 59% of games
7.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
26W–13L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
150 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
142 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
130 matches
#1 Singles
12%
61 matches
#2 Singles
3%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King