← Search

Hailey Winegar

AMMON, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 54W–32L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Hailey Winegar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
Emma Shurtliff / Jarom Walz
2026-08-31 · Thompson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tyson Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-24 · Thompson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tyson Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Thompson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tyson Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · Price Hill · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carlicia Huntsman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · Price Hill · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-23 · Price Hill · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikelle Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · Erica Clayton · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kasey Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Thompreemann · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-06-18 · Erica Clayton · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-09 · Erica Clayton · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 66.2% of games
4.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 55.3% of games
4.5
50%
7W–7L · 49.6% of games
6.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 69.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 63.6% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#2 Singles
19%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova