← Search

Alicia Woodhouse

Idaho Falls, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
294 matches · 200W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alicia Woodhouse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history294 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Thompson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Royce Woodhouse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Thompson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Royce Woodhouse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-26 · Thompson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Royce Woodhouse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-18 · Kunz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · Thompson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Royce Woodhouse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Kunz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Woodhouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-05 · 40 Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · 40 Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charity Kunz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · 40 Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charity Kunz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · 40 Love · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · Kunz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Ralston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · Kunz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Ralston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 62.9% of games
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 73.1% of games
3.5
87.8%
36W–5L · 66.5% of games
4.0
68.6%
48W–22L · 58.9% of games
4.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 49.8% of games
2.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 65.8% of games
6.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 63.3% of games
6.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 52.5% of games
7.5mixed
57.6%
19W–14L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 55.8% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
62 matches
#1 Singles
12%
35 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King