← Search

Stephanie Ralston

Idaho Falls, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
372 matches · 225W–147L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Ralston to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history372 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Steph Ralston · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dallas Rodabough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Mark Taylor / Tina Taylor
2026-09-09 · The Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Newell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-03 · Steph Ralston · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Pigott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-09-01 · Steph Ralston · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Pierce Bolton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Travis Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Steph Ralston · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brent Harmon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · The Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Travis Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Travis Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Steph Ralston · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jarom Walz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · Wendy Ellison · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellie Surmelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · Fire & Ice · #1 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Kunz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Woodhouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 61.5% of games
3.5
80.6%
25W–6L · 60.6% of games
4.0
66.7%
52W–26L · 57.7% of games
4.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 41.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.6% of games
6.5mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 63.1% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
25W–20L · 50.4% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
30W–12L · 57.8% of games
8.0mixed
53.7%
22W–19L · 51.9% of games
8.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.3% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
168 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
69 matches
#1 Singles
3%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova