← Search

Dolly Gonzales

Pocatello, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 55W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dolly Gonzales to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-05 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Grigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Paulsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Sally Nielson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Wendy Elison championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Grigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Wendy Elison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · Wendy Elison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · Sally Nielson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendy Elison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · Sally Nielson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendy Elison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Karen McGee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Elison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · Karen McGee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorie Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
30%
15W–35L · 43.3% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.4% of games
8.0
44.1%
15W–19L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.2% of games
7.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 46.6% of games
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
42 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams