← Search

Wendy Elison

Mccammon, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
325 matches · 190W–135L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Wendy Elison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history325 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Baseline* · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bobby Arteaga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Baseline* · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bobby Arteaga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · Wendy Ellison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Osborn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Dolly Gonzales championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-28 · Wendy Ellison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Wendy Elison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mattson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-21 · Wendy Ellison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lyndsi Whitworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-20 · Wendy Elison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Teresa Henderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Quincy Sutton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Aspin Rhoades championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
82.8%
24W–5L · 65.6% of games
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 71.1% of games
3.5
67.4%
60W–29L · 56.4% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.3% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.9% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 60.7% of games
6.5mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
47.6%
30W–33L · 50.7% of games
7.5mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
106 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
98 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
85 matches
#1 Singles
9%
28 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer