← Search

Karen Hartman

Pocatello, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 20W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Karen Hartman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Beat the Heat · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shauna Myler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · Fun In The Sun · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-28 · Beat the Heat · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Beat the Heat · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · Fun In The Sun · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-20 · Fun In The Sun · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorie Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Drop Shot Divas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · Players · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-19 · Players · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-06-18 · Drop Shot Divas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Daw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Players · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Drop Shot Divas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Krammen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 49.4% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 42% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe