← Search

Kirsten Nickisch

Pocatello, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 99W–141L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kirsten Nickisch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Court Potatoes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Howard Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-03 · Court Potatoes · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Levi Jensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-06 · Middle Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Middle Aces · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · Middle Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Rose Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Petti/ Lindley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Tapanila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · Middle Aces · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Petti/ Lindley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Rose Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · Middle Aces · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · Petti/ Lindley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Surmelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
54.8%
23W–19L · 53.9% of games
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 55.2% of games
3.5
36.1%
26W–46L · 43.9% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.8% of games
6.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
31.5%
17W–37L · 42.9% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 25.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
37 matches
#2 Singles
12%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal