Teams

Middle Aces

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-06vs Beat the HeatWon 31
L#1 DoublesLori Tapanila / Colleen Hansen vs Karen Hartman / Shauna Myler0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnnie Thomas vs Grace Jory6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Venita Petti vs Emily Smith / Heather Gunter6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKirsten Nickisch / Erin Hobbs vs Kaydene Gilbert / Kimber Nelson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-28vs Beat the HeatWon 31
W#1 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Anita Gibson vs Diane Poole / Shauna Myler6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Karen Hartman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnnie Thomas / Amy Lapp vs Heather Gunter / Amanda Frost6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesColleen Hansen / Julie Hall vs Kaydene Gilbert / Kimber Nelson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-23vs Beat the HeatLost 13
L#1 DoublesKirsten Nickisch / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Lyn McArthur / Michele Surmelis2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAnnie Thomas vs Grace Jory1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori Tapanila / Amy Lapp vs Emily Smith / Karen Hartman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Hall / Erin Hobbs vs Karlee Moeai / Heather Gunter3-6, 1-6
2026-07-14vs Beat the HeatSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Venita Petti vs Shauna Myler / Michele Surmelis7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Diane Poole6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Tapanila / Colleen Hansen vs Lyn McArthur / Karlee Moeai1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Lapp / Erin Hobbs vs Heather Gunter / Amanda Frost4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-09vs Beat the HeatLost 04
L#1 DoublesAnita Gibson / Venita Petti vs Diane Poole / Michele Surmelis0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Grace Jory2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLori Tapanila / Erin Hobbs vs Lyn McArthur / Emily Smith1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Lapp / Julie Hall vs Amanda Frost / Heather Gunter3-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs Beat the HeatSplit 22
L#1 DoublesVenita Petti / Colleen Hansen vs Shauna Myler / Michele Surmelis0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesErin Hobbs vs Lyn McArthur6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLori Tapanila / Annie Thomas vs Diane Poole / Heather Gunter6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Hall / Amy Lapp vs Kimber Nelson / Kaydene Gilbert6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Anita Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.10
Annie Thomas
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
3.02
Carrie Rose Lindley
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.86
Kirsten Nickisch
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Amy Lapp
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Venita Petti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.62
Colleen Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Lori Tapanila
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Erin Hobbs
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.17
Julie Hall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Gibson + Amy Lapp2350% games+5.5% vs expected
Venita Petti + Carrie Rose Lindley7453% games−0.8% vs expected
Colleen Hansen + Lori Tapanila3541% games−6.0% vs expected
Lori Tapanila + Amy Lapp2736% games−6.5% vs expected
Anita Gibson + Venita Petti4162% gamesnot enough data
Lori Tapanila + Venita Petti1440% gamesnot enough data
Colleen Hansen + Venita Petti224 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Hansen + Carrie Rose Lindley404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anita Gibson
146W–134L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Annie Thomas
44W–40L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Carrie Rose Lindley
49W–62L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Kirsten Nickisch
98W–140L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Amy Lapp
51W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Venita Petti
81W–116L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Colleen Hansen
46W–112L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Lori Tapanila
61W–108L career · 9 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Erin Hobbs
30W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Julie Hall
25W–99L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.