← Search

Colleen Hansen

Pocatello, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
147 matches · 40W–107L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Pocatello · 3.0
27 of 28
ID · 3.0
230 of 240
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Colleen is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Colleen has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920202021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Colleen has gone from the 52nd to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 42.5% of games
3.0
40.5%
17W–25L · 43.9% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 26.9% of games
6.0mixed
21.2%
11W–41L · 37.8% of games
6.5mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history147 matches
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Carrie Rose Lindley
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Lori Tapanila
−0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Hall
+0.026better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Breanna Aldrich / Tina Taylorchamps
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Lori Tapanila
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Victoria Scharp
−0.040below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Victoria Scharp
−0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Wendy Davis / Matlin Bawdenchamps
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Victoria Scharp
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Tapanila
−0.022below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venita Petti
−0.045below expectation — took 8% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paige Sheffield
−0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Claire Nelson / Kimber Nelson
2026-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Tapanila
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Rose Lindley
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.