← Search

Victoria Scharp

Pocatello, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
261 matches · 101W–160L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Victoria Scharp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history261 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venita Petti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Petti/ Lindley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Tapanila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-22 · Petti/ Lindley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karlee Moeai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Colleen Hansen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Colleen Hansen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Colleen Hansen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · Petti/ Lindley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karlee Moeai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Petti/ Lindley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karlee Moeai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · Players · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Rose Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · Players · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 49% of games
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 62% of games
3.0
48.6%
36W–38L · 50.6% of games
3.5
14.7%
5W–29L · 35% of games
5.5mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
24W–40L · 48% of games
6.5mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
87 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
75 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King