← Search

Victoria Scharp

Pocatello, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
260 matches · 101W–159L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.91
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
88%
stay 3.0
12%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.85. Lower than today’s 2.91 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Pocatello · 3.0
18 of 28
ID · 3.0
147 of 240
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Victoria is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Victoria has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Victoria has gone from the 31st to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
0.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 49% of games
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 71.8% of games
3.0
47.5%
29W–32L · 51.1% of games
3.5
22%
9W–32L · 38.8% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 46% of games
5.5mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
24W–40L · 48% of games
6.5mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history260 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Gibson
+0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Tapanila
+0.005below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Poole
+0.037better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karlee Moeai
+0.003about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Colleen Hansen
−0.081below expectation — took 8% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Colleen Hansen
−0.059below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Wendy Davis / Matlin Bawdenchamps
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Colleen Hansen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karlee Moeai
−0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karlee Moeai
+0.013about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Rachel Krammen / Amber Nelson
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Rose Lindley
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Heather Gunter / Janice Nelson
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Gibson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Nelson
+0.045better than expected — took 52% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.