← Search

Cathy Drake

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
111 matches · 57W–54L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
81%
stay 3.0
19%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Boise · 3.0
51 of 79
ID · 3.0
135 of 240
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Cathy is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cathy has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cathy has gone from the 19th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
72.7%
24W–9L · 61.3% of games
3.5
13.6%
3W–19L · 32.9% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 55.9% of games
7.0
30%
3W–7L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history111 matches
L
Carrie Rose Lindley / Colleen Hansenchamps
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Laurie Nowierski
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Stefanie Glaspell / Cathy Johnson
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Prohaska
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
L
Jeannie Amader / Cathy Johnson
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Nowierski
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Sabrina Stokes / Andi Trued
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Reynolds
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
L
Lori Hosac / Allison Rohnert
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathlyn Johans
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
L
Lori Barnum / Barbara Beagles
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Brack
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-1
L
Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin / Vicki Osweiler
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Novak
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
W
Shelley Lundstedt / Sheila Bush
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daphne McNeal
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Crookston
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-4
W
Kristen Jones / Beverly Takeuchi
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Crookston
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daphne McNeal
+0.056better than expected — took 86% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Teresa Thonney / Barbara Wessner
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Getz
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.