← Search

Nikki Reynolds

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 74W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nikki Reynolds to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Daphne McNeal championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · Serving Up Sass · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawnee Perdue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Bend & Snap! · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daphne McNeal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Serving Up Sass · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawnee Perdue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · Bend & Snap! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Prohaska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-20 · Serving Up Sass · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawnee Perdue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-11 · Serve-ivors · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-06 · Serve-ivors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle McSorley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · Serving Up Trouble · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daphne McNeal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · Serve-ivors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Nowierski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-2
W
2026-04-30 · Serving Up Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-29 · Serve-ivors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
62.7%
37W–22L · 56.1% of games
3.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 48% of games
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 60.5% of games
7.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal