← Search

Carol Mills

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 71W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carol Mills to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Raborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Orlando Ciniglio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Raborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Raborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · 7-6 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Raley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · 7-6 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vita Mobley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · 7-6 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Waine-Cunliffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · 7-6 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Thonney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-01 · 7-6 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-20 · 7-6 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Thiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-11 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Yost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-04 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Hickok
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
59.7%
43W–29L · 52.9% of games
3.5
20%
4W–16L · 33.7% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.3% of games
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 39.2% of games
6.5mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
42.3%
11W–15L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
48 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal