← Search

Collette Bott

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 66W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Collette Bott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-08-11 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Forty and Fabulous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-28 · Forty and Fabulous · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Nef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-14 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-09 · Hulse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margo Nef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · Hulse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Zentner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-28 · Hulse · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margo Nef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
55.7%
34W–27L · 54% of games
4.0
10.5%
2W–17L · 29.2% of games
7.0
51.4%
18W–17L · 48.6% of games
8.0
25%
4W–12L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
28 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer