← Search

Bobby Arteaga

Pocatello, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
377 matches · 139W–238L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bobby Arteaga to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history377 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Baseline* · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Elison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Baseline* · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Henderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Baseline* · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Elison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · Pocatello · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joeri Klutsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Pocatello · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joeri Klutsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Pocatello · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with David Brake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Pocatello · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · Pocatello · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Gwinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · Pocatello · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · The Chancla · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Snell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · The Chancla · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Bitton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
25%
7W–21L · 39.5% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.2%
60W–32L · 53.6% of games
4.5
15%
3W–17L · 35% of games
7.0mixed
41.4%
12W–17L · 48.1% of games
7.5mixed
31.6%
12W–26L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
38.8%
31W–49L · 46% of games
8.5mixed
16.1%
5W–26L · 38.7% of games
9.0mixed
6.2%
1W–15L · 32.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
128 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
126 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
92 matches
#1 Singles
8%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova