← Search

David Brake

Pocatello, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
481 matches · 290W–191L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Brake to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history481 matches
W
David Pigott / Jennifer Lloyd
2026-09-10 · Ashley Snyder · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sophia Haroian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · Ashley Snyder · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sophia Haroian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-03 · Harmon · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Mattson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-09-01 · Ashley Snyder · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sydney Stradinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · Harmon · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Mattson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Harmon · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Mattson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Debbie Akers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Debbie Akers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Allishia Sanford championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-12 · Brake · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joeri Klutsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-10 · Brake · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joeri Klutsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · Brake · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Enoch Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
52.1%
37W–34L · 53.2% of games
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.8% of games
3.5
77.3%
34W–10L · 61.5% of games
4.0
58.8%
67W–47L · 54.4% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 40% of games
5.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 47% of games
6.5mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 59% of games
7.0mixed
56.1%
23W–18L · 54.5% of games
7.5mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
60.5%
23W–15L · 50.7% of games
8.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
133 matches
#1 Singles
27%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
127 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
84 matches
#2 Singles
2%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova