← Search

Matt Green

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 61W–43L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Matt Green to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-09-09 · The Mixfits · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa della Badia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · The Mixfits · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Judy Baier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Bobette Wood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · The Mixfits · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brijean Brennan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bobette Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Brashear mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bobette Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-25 · Chuck Norris · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chadd Cripe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · Chuck Norris · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Stillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Chuck Norris · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nate Espinola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Small championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Mallory championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 55.7% of games
3.5
55.3%
21W–17L · 54.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 28.8% of games
6.5mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 54.3% of games
7.0mixed
76.2%
16W–5L · 57.7% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
38 matches
#1 Singles
24%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer