← Search

Stephanie Churchman

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 136W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Churchman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
L
2026-09-02 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Rosellini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-28 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bryan Dingel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Rebecca Fitzpatrick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Janet Roe / Lana Penrose
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Rebecca Fitzpatrick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Rebecca Fitzpatrick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Emerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Emerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-25 · Vintage Volleys · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · Nice Hits 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Shady Ladies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paige Gustavsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · Vintage Volleys · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Shady Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
95%
38W–2L · 70.2% of games
3.5
59.6%
34W–23L · 53.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 35.4% of games
6.0
75%
12W–4L · 53.7% of games
7.0
44.4%
20W–25L · 48.2% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.5% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.6% of games
7.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 47.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#1 Singles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer