← Search

Bryan Dingel

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 105W–134L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bryan Dingel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history239 matches
L
2026-08-28 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Churchman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Agler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blake Ediss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-22 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Atticus Faul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Winfield Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-15 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Agler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cody Perdue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cody Perdue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Decker Rolph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-28 · MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Atticus Faul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · MSA 7.0 (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Valencia Bilyeu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Winfield Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
53.8%
14W–12L · 54.8% of games
4.0
39.5%
34W–52L · 47.3% of games
4.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.8% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 53.2% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.5% of games
6.5mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
10W–25L · 43.2% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
30 matches
#1 Singles
8%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe