← Search

JAYDIP GUHA

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 151W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add JAYDIP GUHA to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history257 matches
L
2026-08-12 · No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shawna Byington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Sheils
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tayler Henrie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Sheils
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chandra Angadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chandra Angadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajan Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajan Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajan Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-10 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brahma Reddy Yenumula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-08 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brahma Reddy Yenumula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brahma Reddy Yenumula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
72.3%
34W–13L · 58.6% of games
4.0
45.7%
37W–44L · 48.8% of games
6.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
26W–10L · 59.4% of games
7.5mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 57.2% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
92 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
68 matches
#1 Singles
8%
20 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams