← Search

Shane Vaughan

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 127W–111L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shane Vaughan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Winfield Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Agler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Wyckoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blake Ediss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Decker Rolph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Winfield Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · MSA 8.0 (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tanya Vaughan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-14 · MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Dingel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-12 · MSA 8.0 (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tanya Vaughan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-07 · MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Dingel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · MSA 8.0 (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tanya Vaughan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Magnuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
82.1%
23W–5L · 63.8% of games
4.0
51%
52W–50L · 49.7% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.8% of games
7.5mixed
57.9%
22W–16L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
28.2%
11W–28L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
38 matches
#1 Singles
12%
28 matches
#2 Singles
7%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova