← Search

John Rosellini

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 85W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John Rosellini to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-09-02 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Churchman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-26 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sondra Power-Thornton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-19 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stella Emerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sondra Power-Thornton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-08-12 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sondra Power-Thornton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Decker Rolph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Ediss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Christopher Silversmith / Jeremie Moll
2025-09-05 · #1 Doubles · with Atticus Faul championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Jesse Mangum / David Ludlow
2025-09-05 · #1 Doubles · with Atticus Faul championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Atticus Faul championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Kevin Maloney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
60.9%
28W–18L · 55.6% of games
4.0
43.3%
13W–17L · 46.8% of games
8.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 49.3% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50.3% of games
7.5mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
34.4%
11W–21L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova