← Search

Nate Espinola

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 77W–122L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nate Espinola to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Shawna Byington championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Hawkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Hawkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Hawkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Hawkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Boise Bear Down · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Boise Bear Down · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Waldram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · Chuck Norris · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Felt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Boise Bear Down · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · Chuck Norris · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dit Dudley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-22 · Boise Bear Down · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Henry Prendergast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Chuck Norris · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Felt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.9% of games
3.5
36.2%
29W–51L · 46.5% of games
4.0
10.5%
2W–17L · 33.1% of games
6.5mixed
70.4%
19W–8L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
43.8%
21W–27L · 47.2% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–7L · 29.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
50 matches
#1 Singles
16%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal