Search

Mike Willits

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
134 matches · 64W–70L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Teams32 teams · 2015–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mike has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Mike has gone from the 57th to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.5% of games
3.5
52.4%
43W–39L · 49.2% of games
4.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.5% of games
6.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.5% of games
6.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.7% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history134 matches
L
Chris Angermayer / Valencia Bilyeumixed
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Chatfield
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Brad Smith / Coree Carvermixed
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Chatfield
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Fred Costello / Coree Carvermixed
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Chatfield
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Nate Espinola / Luke Felt
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judah Dorn
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Daniel Waldram / John McGee
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Prendergast
0.002about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Prasad Kandukuri / Satya Venkata Naga Ganesh Nanduri
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Prendergast
+0.031better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Thomas Angstman / Mike Egner
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Prendergast
+0.036better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
Kade Andrus / Kyle Polito
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Wallmann
+0.016better than expected — took 53% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
James Mertz / David Roberts
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Prendergast
0.042below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Mark Stillman / Nick Murray
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eddie Dunn
0.074below expectation — took 8% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
JP Shedoudi / Mark Thomann
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judah Dorn
+0.008about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Cameron Schultz / Erica Gonzalezmixed
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Liz Barbee
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.