← Search

Kelly Somsen

Idaho Falls, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
375 matches · 214W–161L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kelly Somsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history375 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Somsen/Kunz · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Stosich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
Stephanie Ralston / David Pigott
2026-09-03 · Somsen/Kunz · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Stosich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-25 · Somsen/Kunz · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cory Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Brian Cook championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Brian Cook championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Brian Cook championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Price Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tresa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-11 · Price Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tresa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Price Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tresa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Price Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · Price Hill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tresa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Tresa Mason championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
50%
4W–4L · 48.4% of games
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 47.3% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
72.4%
71W–27L · 59% of games
4.5
29.4%
15W–36L · 42.6% of games
7.0mixed
65.6%
21W–11L · 55.2% of games
7.5mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 50.2% of games
8.0mixed
62.7%
32W–19L · 53.4% of games
8.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.4% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
152 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
132 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
87 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert