← Search

Aimee Powell

Idaho Falls, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
206 matches · 119W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Aimee Powell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history206 matches
L
2026-08-05 · Kasey The Bombdigity · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Preece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · Kasey The Bombdigity · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · Kasey The Bombdigity · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · Kasey The Bombdigity · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kasey Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · Where The Wild Things Are · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-06-18 · Erica Clayton · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tresa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · Erica Clayton · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · Erica Clayton · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Erica Clayton · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Somsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-01 · Erica Clayton · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kasey Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · Erica Clayton · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · Erica Clayton · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erica Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.9% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
91.4%
32W–3L · 64.1% of games
4.5
53.6%
37W–32L · 52.4% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.6% of games
8.5mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.4% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
40 matches
#1 Singles
12%
24 matches
#2 Singles
9%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova