← Search

Kellee Bates

Boise, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 104W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kellee Bates to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-09-08 · The Hounds · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ryan van de Graaff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-03 · The Hounds · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Fazal Shariff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-27 · The Hounds · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Fazal Shariff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-25 · The Hounds · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephen Heath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-23 · Bringin' the Racket · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobette Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · The Hounds · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ryan van de Graaff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-18 · The Hounds · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephen Heath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-13 · The Hounds · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brent Bradburn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
Marne Darrall / Stacey Heroy
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Dana Rosellini championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Stephanie Skarwecki / Crista Gilmore
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Emily Flores championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Emily Flores championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Dana Rosellini championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
84%
21W–4L · 63.3% of games
4.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 46.8% of games
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 54.9% of games
8.5mixed
60%
15W–10L · 56.2% of games
9.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 60% of games
9.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
39 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe