← Search

Maji Daines

Boise, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
248 matches · 172W–76L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Maji Daines to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history248 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Serve Mix-A-Lot · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mel Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Serve Mix-A-Lot · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rick Roby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-13 · Serve Mix-A-Lot · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cody Perdue mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dana Rosellini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dana Rosellini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Holly Sample
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Holly Sample
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Holly Sample
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · PTSA 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Hodson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · PTSA 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Gillis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · PTSA 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · PTSA 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Misaki Horikiri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 62.9% of games
3.5
95%
19W–1L · 65.5% of games
4.0
79.5%
35W–9L · 60.9% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.4% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 66.3% of games
8.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 65.2% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 63.6% of games
6.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 55.6% of games
7.5mixed
60%
18W–12L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 50.9% of games
8.5mixed
75%
9W–3L · 57.6% of games
9.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
49 matches
#1 Singles
7%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova