Search

Chad Vaughn

MERIDIAN, ID
4.5S year-end 2026
89 matches · 60W–29L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
99%
stay 4.5
1%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
ID · 4.5
7 of 41

Chad is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chad has been 4.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

4.04.5201920202026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Chad has gone from the 96th to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
91.3%
21W–2L · 66.2% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.4% of games
9.0mixed
54.3%
19W–16L · 50.5% of games
9.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history89 matches
L
Anne Marie Carlisle / Jeffrey Traskmixed
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deniz Aygen
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz Given
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Nelson
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Lori Griffel / Robert Mirandamixed
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Suzanna Murali
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Ryan Warwick / Robb Warwick
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Walser
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
Jonathan Jones / Jason Clements
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Kirby
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Mark Graham / Jami Garvermixed
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Suzanna Murali
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
Jeffrey Trask / Jay Larsen
2026-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Jay
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Wippel
+0.000below expectation — took 13% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 1-0
W
Alexandra Hodson / Ben Meibergenmixed
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Whitlock
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
Michelle Phillips / Jeff Buckinghammixed
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kerri Porritt
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
Oliver Cheng / Brijean Brennanmixed
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Wippel
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.