← Search

Travis Baker

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 117W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Travis Baker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
W
2026-08-31 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Ralston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · The Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-24 · The Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Ralston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Ralston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
Benjamin Kott / Oskar Dagys
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Colby Adams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Tyler Waltman / Brijesh Parikh
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Colby Adams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Milan Doshi / Christopher Jackson
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Colby Adams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Ryan Arfmann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Ryan Arfmann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Joshua Westover championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with James Skillings championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · Antonio's Guys · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derick Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games
3.5
70.6%
24W–10L · 59.4% of games
4.0
40%
6W–9L · 50% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.4% of games
6.5mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
61.1%
22W–14L · 53.3% of games
7.5mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
58 matches
#1 Singles
6%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer