Search

Alexandra Chapman

Idaho Falls, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
148 matches · 72W–76L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Idaho Falls · 4.0
10 of 22
ID · 4.0
125 of 216
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Alexandra is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alexandra has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Alexandra has gone from the 68th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
57.9%
55W–40L · 52.9% of games
4.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 38.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 35.5% of games
8.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.2% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 30.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history148 matches
W
Addison Saxton / Megan Sharp
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kallie Porter
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kallie Porter
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Umphlette
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Umphlette
+0.016better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandi Cornelison
0.064below expectation — took 29% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Bryan
0.021about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikel Harmon
0.048below expectation — took 38% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Lloyd
+0.001about as expected — took 58% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-11 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.066below expectation — took 53% of games against 70% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikelle Price
0.031below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Amanda Foster / NICOLE SPENCE
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikel Harmon
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.