← Search

Mikel Harmon

Pocatello, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
419 matches · 283W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mikel Harmon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history419 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Harmon · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brent Harmon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Melissa Brake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Kymball Ellis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Kymball Ellis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Kim Bryan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Ralston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · Kim Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-19 · Harmon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Brake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-19 · Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Brake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Kim Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Brake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Kim Bryan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · Kim Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
90.8%
69W–7L · 67.2% of games
4.0
45%
18W–22L · 50.2% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 74.1% of games
7.0mixed
84.1%
58W–11L · 63.8% of games
7.5mixed
53.6%
15W–13L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
64.9%
50W–27L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
147 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
138 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
132 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King