← Search

LEIF TAPANILA

Pocatello, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
300 matches · 168W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add LEIF TAPANILA to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history300 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Mixed Mayhem* · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Farnsworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · Court Potatoes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Tapanila mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-03 · Court Potatoes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Annie Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-09-03 · Mixed Mayhem* · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brittany Grigg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-29 · Mixed Mayhem* · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brittany Grigg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Mixed Mayhem* · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brittany Grigg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Shawn Oram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Lynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Pocatello · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Keth Galloway championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Keth Galloway championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Keth Galloway championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Shawn Oram · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Fullmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
57.5%
23W–17L · 54.3% of games
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 61.7% of games
3.5
48.5%
32W–34L · 51.8% of games
4.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 48.4% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.6%
28W–16L · 55.5% of games
6.5mixed
67.9%
19W–9L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
61.4%
27W–17L · 53.2% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
106 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
59 matches
#1 Singles
15%
44 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova