Search

Sadie Simpson

IDAHO FALLS, ID
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 40W–35L · seasons 20222026

Captains: add Sadie Simpson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-06-25 · Thompreemann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellie Willardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-24 · Thompson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jordan Simpson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-15 · Thompson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jordan Simpson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-08 · Thompson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jordan Simpson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2024-06-17 · Kunz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Adolpho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-06-13 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-22 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Adolpho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-20 · Kunz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsie Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-17 · Kunz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.6% of games
3.5
90%
9W–1L · 68.5% of games
4.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.8% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert