← Search

NICOLE SPENCE

Idaho Falls, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
200 matches · 117W–83L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Idaho Falls · 4.0
9 of 22
ID · 4.0
116 of 216
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
NICOLE is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

NICOLE has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, NICOLE has gone from the 3rd to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 71.4% of games
3.5
88%
44W–6L · 63.1% of games
4.0
35.3%
18W–33L · 45.9% of games
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.7% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 46.6% of games
7.5mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history200 matches
W
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Beebe
−0.016about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Beebe
+0.010better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Meikle
+0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Beebe
+0.030better than expected — took 57% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Beebe
−0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Allishia Sanford / Melissa Millican
2026-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ranay Thompson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ranay Thompson
−0.013below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Chadd Cripe / Jami Garvermixedchamps
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Hunter Markowski
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Sophia Haroian / Nathan Richardsonmixedchamps
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Dallas Rodabough
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Woodhouse
−0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Woodhouse
−0.016about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.