← Search

Lynda Fennern

Idaho Falls, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
298 matches · 148W–150L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lynda Fennern to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history298 matches
L
Sue Curtis / AnnMarie Chadwick
2026-08-31 · Pizza 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lois Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Kam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
Marianne Saibara / Michelle Ainge
2026-08-24 · Pizza 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Auxier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · Berry · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandi Cornelison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-17 · The Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Kam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · Fire & Ice · #2 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
L
2026-08-10 · Berry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandi Cornelison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Berry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandi Cornelison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · Lloyd · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alison Dustin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Lloyd · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lurline Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
Sue Curtis / AnnMarie Chadwick
2026-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dorene Sambado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · Berry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lurline Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 49.5% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
53.9%
55W–47L · 52.5% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.6% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 56.6% of games
7.5mixed
67.7%
21W–10L · 57.9% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
9W–15L · 45.1% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
138 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
64 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal