← Search

Erin Wood

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
114 matches · 63W–51L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.28
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Idaho Falls · 3.5
41 of 46
ID · 3.5
227 of 289
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Erin is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erin has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Erin has gone from the 12th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 71.9% of games
3.0
66.7%
22W–11L · 55.9% of games
3.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 49.1% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 37.2% of games
5.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 47.5% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Murdoch
+0.005better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Webb
−0.019below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Ann Traynor
+0.059better than expected — took 60% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Singles
−0.004below expectation — took 14% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lyndsey Hall
+0.009better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Davies
+0.035better than expected — took 48% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.033below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Shelby Hanson / Lisa Wheeler
2026-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Webb
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-20 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.044below expectation — took 32% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Murdoch
+0.025better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Heather Davies
−0.023below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Stacie Hildebrandt / Tracie Mundschamps
2025-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Heather Davies
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.