← Search

Katilyn Onkes

Idaho Falls, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 26W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katilyn Onkes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-07-30 · Tawni Howell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Kuhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · Tawni Howell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cori Cannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Kate Miller / Kristin Di Bona
2026-07-23 · Tawni Howell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tera Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · Tawni Howell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kamarie Hearne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Cari Boyle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Kodi Howell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-30 · Tawni Howell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-25 · Hailey Ball · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · Howell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · Hailey Ball · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hailey Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-17 · Howell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tera Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.5% of games
3.0
57.6%
19W–14L · 52.7% of games
3.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe