← Search

Brian Naeve

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 53W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brian Naeve to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Robyn Roby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robyn Roby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robyn Roby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Merritt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robyn Roby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · Bangers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-16 · Bangers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · Bangers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Buckingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-02 · Bangers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-19 · Bangers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Goslovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Louis Sabala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Magnuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
84.6%
22W–4L · 64.3% of games
4.5
48.9%
23W–24L · 49.5% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.3% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams