← Search

Daniel Peterson

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 73W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daniel Peterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Meikle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Meikle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Meikle · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Stosich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · Meikle · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Godfrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-15 · Meikle · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Jacqualyn Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Jill Reed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Jill Reed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Meikle · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · Meikle · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · Meikle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-05 · Morris Hall · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacqualyn Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.6% of games
3.5
52%
13W–12L · 52.4% of games
6.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.6% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
63.3%
19W–11L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer