← Search

Curtis Godfrey

Ammon, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
38 matches · 20W–18L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Ammon · 3.5
8 of 11
ID · 3.5
250 of 289
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Curtis is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Curtis has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Curtis has gone from the 64th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 54.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Daw
−0.011below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Meikle
−0.018about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Stosich
−0.015below expectation — took 57% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
James Hancock / Travis Nielsen
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Peterson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Simpson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-2
L
Travis Nielsen / Jedediah Bigelow
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Newell
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
W
James Hancock / Joshua Westover
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Western
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
L
Jedediah Bigelow / Joshua Westover
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Chambers
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 7-6
W
Drew Keller / Jason Geary
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Westwood
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Meikle
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.021below expectation — took 23% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 4-0
L
Trent Nier / Sandeep Singh
2025-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Stosich
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.