← Search

Travis Nielsen

Rexburg, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 46W–47L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Travis Nielsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
Bransen McCall / Cooper Wayment
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Joshua Westover championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Ari Opsahl
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Joshua Westover championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Joshua Westover championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Colby Adams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-24 · TBD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-22 · TBD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · TBD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jedediah Bigelow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · TBD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colby Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · TBD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-07 · Hinkson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-05 · Hinkson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Westwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.2% of games
3.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 60.9% of games
3.5
36%
9W–16L · 45.3% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.2% of games
6.5mixed
50%
8W–8L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams