← Search

Steve Warner

Ammon, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 77W–82L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Steve Warner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-09-01 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Belloff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Backhand Ballers Facer · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Camille Aguinaga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-19 · Backhand Ballers Facer · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Camille Aguinaga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-17 · Backhand Ballers Facer · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Camille Aguinaga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-13 · Hinkson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
Eric Anderson / Daniel Leach
2026-08-05 · Match Points & Ibuprofen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patrick Trimp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Shawn Oram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Habashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-03 · Hinkson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Leong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Patrick Trimp championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Jeremy Westwood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · Match Points & Ibuprofen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · Shawn Oram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Lynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
55.3%
26W–21L · 52.7% of games
3.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 35.7% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
65.8%
25W–13L · 60.5% of games
6.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer